As we enter the home stretch of the 76th Cannes Film Festival, two old-timers join the competition and may have gifted us with this year’s acting winners. First off, we have 74-year-old French director Catherine Breillat’s Last Summer, a remake of the 2019 Danish drama Queen of Hearts – with a French twist.
Léa Drucker plays Anne, a successful lawyer specializing in cases of abuse involving minors. Anne lives with her husband Pierre and their two adopted daughters in a beautiful country home. When Pierre’s 17-year-old son from a previous marriage, Théo (played by Samuel Kircher), moves in with them, Anne’s blandly perfect life is disrupted and it doesn’t take long before she begins a risky affair with her underage stepson.
Those who have a cursory knowledge of Breillat’s filmography would not be surprised by her decision to remake this particular film, the subject matter is right up her alley. Over a career that spans nearly 50 years, Breillat has made a name for herself through films that deal with tricky gender/sexual politics, often featuring female characters who subvert societal expectations. With Last Summer, she revisits a story of taboos and makes changes to the original to have it be even more about female sexuality. It’s provocative and a lot of brazen fun.
In the 2019 film, for example, the line between stepmother and -son is only crossed after a lot of accidental sparks, whereas here their relationship is portrayed pretty much as an unmistakable affair with two equal, willing participants. Which makes the first sex scene between the two even more shocking to watch. Breillat also rewrote the third act to downplay the thriller element of the original and focus on the perverted sexual dynamics between husband, wife and the verboten lover. As is the case with many of her films, the final scene of Last Summer hints at something quietly, wickedly subversive.
At one point, Anne says she thinks vertigo is not the fear of heights but the fear of succumbing to the temptation of falling that one voluntarily jumps. The sentiment gives us access to Anne’s psychology and Drucker built a fiercely truthful performance around it. As Trine Dyrholm did in the original, her portrayal of Anne maps a stunning curve of transformation and at no point is she less than utterly convincing. In the scene where Anne denies the affair to her husband and the subsequent scene where she calls Théo a liar to his face, she basically turns into the type of abuser she defends her clients against, and the force of her conviction is frightening. Based on these scenes alone, she should be considered a strong contender for the best actress prize.
On the other end of the subversion scale, we have the soothing, breezily tender drama Perfect Days by 77-year-old German director Wim Wenders, winner of the Palme d’Or for Paris, Texas back in 1984. Set in Tokyo, the film follows Hirayama (Kôji Yakusho), a janitor who drives around in a van to clean the city’s public toilets. Hirayama is a man of few words and many routines. On a work day, he wakes up, gets ready, cleans toilets around the city, washes at his local bathhouse, eats at his favorite diner and goes home to sleep. In his downtime, he reads, takes pictures, hangs at his bar of choice. As the film establishes with its entire first act, Hirayama’s life is so fully dictated by to-do’s there’s hardly room for improvisation, for other humans.
A co-worker’s love life emergency, an anonymous note left at one of his toilets and the unexpected visit by an estranged niece would eventually stir up ripples in Hirayama’s perfect, unchanging days, allowing us glimpses into the mind of someone leading such a self-imposed isolated existence.
The film is very gentle, untheatrical in tone. The first half-hour almost feels like a documentary as it neutrally, quietly records the protagonist’s daily grind. And yet, from its opening frame on, the film is never stale or uninteresting. DP Franz Lustig’s camera finds the soul in everything it sees, rendering shots of everyday objects, Hirayama’s upturned face, trees large and small that so capture his fancy splendidly full of life. Co-written by Takuma Takasaki, Wenders’ screenplay excels at telling stories with all that it doesn’t say. Why does the hero live alone? Why is he so reluctant to talk to anyone? How did such an avid reader end up working as a janitor? A meeting later in the film with his sister would fill in some blanks, but it’s the mystery that keeps the character so vividly alive.
Considering how little the protagonist speaks, it takes a performance of great charisma for the film to work, and Yakusho radiates such elegance and humanity he just about glows. We often see him silently pondering, deciding and doing things that are never explained, and yet on a most basic human level, you’re right with his character every step of the way. The film closes with an extended close-up shot of him driving in the morning sun. There’s no dialogue or title card but the frame bursts with the warmth of understanding, everything is illuminated.
17 Comments
Great dispatch, as usual. Can’t wait to discover the jury’s picks tomorrow !
With such an impressive line-up and many films that received good to great reviews it´s even more challenging to predict the winners! Aside “The Zone of Interest”, which seems to be the favourite choice for the Palm d´Or, we have quite many candidates that could surprise: “Youth”, “May December”, “Fallen Leaves” or probably “The Pot au feu”, “Anatomy of a Fall” or “Four Daughters” – thrilling competition this year!
And still the vague rumors I’ve read about who is still hanging around at Cannes/might have been asked to return have to do with at the very least one of the worst-reviewed films in the competition
Can you fill us in? I’m not up to date on the rumours but love gossip!
Apparently the director who was supposedly asked back was also seen at the La Chimera premiere so that might imply something so this might lend some validity to the rumor. But then again many other directors of competition titles (at leastHirokazu Kore-eda, Jessica Hausner, Todd Haynes and Wang Bing ) are supposedly still around as well. Apparently also Kaurismäki has left and supposedly “is not attending the awards ceremony” but as these things usually go, if the call comes, they might be on a plane pretty quickly. Also, the news story that reported it read like they don’t quite understand how these things work (not that they should, it’s not like this was written for a film-centric publication), basically they equated them having left with them not attending while at the same time stating that no one, inlcuding them, has been able to interview the director in question during the festival so it’s probably based on conjecture.
This seems highly unlikely to be true and is very much a third-hand rumor at best (I read it on another forum where it sounded like the person telling the rumor had heard it from someone else and was doubtful of it) but supposedly in particular one director was asked back already yesterday (which would probably imply a pretty big favorite if the jury knew they were going to give them something before they watched the Rohrwacher and the Loach). I’m not going to name the film directly (because though I don’t mind telling about the rumor, I want to obfuscate who it might be a little bit) but let’s just say that if the rumor is true, the jury apparently shares Fremaux’s seeming obsession with a specific actor who has among other things got a film of theirs a competition spot under false pretenses few years ago (and despite this, Fremaux still asked them back for their following film) and who also from what I recall might have been the one who made the festival completely restructure the way the press screenings worked for at least one year (I’m not sure if it’s returned fully to the way it was before or whether the changes made since are a new third form)
That was a fun riddle!
I don’t really have a clue but I was thinking about an Italian director who has won before..?
The thing with the Moretti film that I found quite interesting was that the movie came out in Italy in April and seemingly got a very positive reception, then it premiered at Cannes on Wednesday and the reactions were mostly quite awful (beyond a few corners of people who seem to in general be Moretti loyalists). So maybe it’s more of a mainstream audience film. And in terms of crowdpleasers, I’d imagine it wasn’t in an ideal slot since the other film that premiered on the same day was seemingly the maintream crowdpleaser of the festival, The Pot-au-Feu.
But to be clear, I’m not talking about Moretti. At least the one film that I’ve seen from this director is much worse.
Oh then I´m pretty sure you are talking about a French director – would be an awful choice (even though I haven´t seen his film of course) to chose that film over so many highly lauded candidates this year… Damn, I´m really thrilled for tonight!
Now that the rumor has proven to be false, the director I was talking about was Jean-Stéphane Sauvaire whose film Black Flies was probably the worst-reviewed film in competition and whose film A Prayer Before Dawn I found to be astonishingly bad when I watched it last week for my “Cannes watch-along”. And you can figure out the actor I was talking about from there.
I’ve read a comment on World of Reel yesterday that claims the last two films of the competition are seen by the jury on the first day of the Festival (before the opening ceremony and the opening film) to allow more time for a consensus to build and to call back winners.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ea46b5d655156725d7e330a3821fd9e6a12e597569f52b10a3113e4fad3d346f.jpg
I’ve read a comment on World of Reel yesterday that claims the last two films of the competition are seen by the jury on the first day of the Festival (before the opening ceremony and the opening film) to allow more time for a consensus to build and to call back winners.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ea46b5d655156725d7e330a3821fd9e6a12e597569f52b10a3113e4fad3d346f.jpg
I’ve read a comment on World of Reel yesterday that claims the last two films of the competition are seen by the jury on the first day of the Festival (before the opening ceremony and the opening film) to allow more time for a consensus to build and to call back winners.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ea46b5d655156725d7e330a3821fd9e6a12e597569f52b10a3113e4fad3d346f.jpg
That sounds unrealistic to me simply because if I’m not mistaken, supposedly the reason why Rohrwacher’s film screened so late is that they were still working on the film (and that has certainly happened before, in recent years most famously with Lynne Ramsay’s You Were Never Really Here). On top of this, isn’t there information about whether the jury is at the premieres of these movies? And basically if they’re present at the screenings and change their minds upon second viewing, wouldn’t that make the whole process moot?
Yeah, it’s the first time I’ve ever heard of such a thing and I can’t find a proper source to confirm it. I asked the commenter if he had one so I’ll let you know if he does. I’m not going to dispute your various points because I really don’t know.
My prior understanding was that the jury votes in the morning on the day of the ceremony and then the winners are notified so they can travel to Cannes during the afternoon, but I guess it can be an issue to come at such short notice unless likely winners have remained in nearby areas. And then there’s Tarantino who came to the ceremony in 2019 even though his film won nothing there.
Pingback: 2023 Cannes Dispatch: That’s a Wrap – Awardsdaily