The most high-profile title at the 76th Cannes Film Festival – Killers of the Flower Moon by Palme d’Or winner Martin Scorsese – had its single press screening today. As the film played in the packed Debussy Theater, I was suddenly struck by something I noticed: it’s the sound of an entire auditorium being held in such rapt attention the air starts to feel thick. It’s the sound that a movie is working. Expertly written, directed, acted and edited, the three-and-a-half-hour crime drama swooshed by with remarkable ease. It’s an at once highly entertaining and thought-provoking look at a piece of native American history. Oscars will likely take notice.
Set during the 1920’s in Osage County, where the natives have become affluent through oil and attracted the envy of white Americans, Ernest (Leonardo DiCaprio) relocates there in search of opportunities like many of his compatriots. His uncle William “King” Hale (Robert De Niro) is a local businessman and directs Ernest to “full-blood” Indian girl Mollie (Lily Gladstone), whose family owns a large estate. Not long after the two fall in love and get married, Hale makes his intent to take over Mollie’s family estate known and, all around her, people start to drop like flies. At first neglecting the atrocity altogether, the federal government eventually sends a team of investigators led by Officer White (Jesse Plemons) to track down the killers.
The excellent adapted screenplay by Scorsese and Eric Roth breezily unpacks the multi-layered plot, covering different aspects of a decade-spanning story with great skill. The killings and the belated intervention by law enforcement, the observation on the evolving relationship between whites and Indians at the start of the 20th century, and the tragic love story that ends up costing a woman everything come together beautifully to give the film its epic, novelistic sweep. And something people probably wouldn’t expect from Killers of the Flower Moon is that it’s often quite funny. The cold-blooded murder of native Americans is of course no laughing matter, but the naked greed and outsized ego of Uncle Hale, the bumbling awkwardness of his helpers deserve to be made fun of. Kudos to the writers for successfully incorporating comedy in an otherwise deeply sad tale. It adds an truthful edge to the portrayal of exploiters and enablers, and gives the film a richer, more balanced tone.
Speaking of tones, credit must be given to legendary editor Thelma Schoonmaker, who once again shows her mastery of tonal control. Cutting with absolute precision and a coolness to die for, she keeps things going at a brisk pace and jumps between the film’s lighter and darker notes without missing a beat. Some of these transitions are so smooth they feel downright musical.
Of the principal cast, DiCaprio’s performance is the one most laced with comedy. Ernest is a character who seems driven by the need to do right by everybody. He doesn’t have a strong moral compass and, in his quest to please Uncle Hale, is ready to do all his dirty work. The fact that he isn’t the most proficient criminal or just not the brightest bulb in the box opens up a lot of comedic potential. To me, De Niro and Gladstone delivered the best performances here. It’s a delight to see De Niro in despicable villain mode. His character is so used to having things his way he’s lost all self-awareness. The sight of him continuing to pressure others from his prison cell with psychotic conviction is both ridiculous and chilling. You can tell this is a character so blinded by greed, hate and disregard for human life there’s no turning back for them. Gladstone’s character is the moral/human anchor of the film. From a young woman falling in love with an outsider to a physically and emotionally battered mother plagued by paranoia, she always chooses to hold onto kindness and decency. That warmth of humanity emanates from her eyes and you can’t help but sympathize.
Assembling all these brilliant parts into an organic whole is Scorsese’s direction. Mindful of the historic injustice but not weighted down by tragedy, he made a film that is thrilling, informative, goofy, reflective – it feels alive. Shown out of competition at Cannes, Killers of the Flower Moon is nonetheless a highlight of this year’s selection.
32 Comments
i loved the Variety review obviously Peter Dubruge hasn’t drunk St. Marty’s Kool Aid ! I guess people who liked the overkill of Wolf of Wall Street and The Irishman will eat this up ! And a case can be made that Killers of the Flower Moon even though it’s based on a true story in a strange way is an overblown sequel to a low budget 1958 Joseph H. Lewis western starring Sterling Hayden and Sebastion Cabot written by Dalton Trumbo called Terror in a Texas Town !
it so9unds like this movie is more Kind Hearts and Coronets than anything else.
Attention also must be paid to Robert DeNiro for portraying in his last two films one of the lesser known heroes’ of the twentieth century General Smedley Darliington Butler in last years Amsterdam and one of the most notoriously evil people of the same period William ‘” King ”
Hale . He is a national treasure !
MC 91 and RT 96… BP nom and Director, locked already. Lily Gladstone probably is this year’s Ke Huy Quan. But probably too long and violent to win BP. I stick with Next Goal Wins as my suspected BP winner, once dust settles.
Palm d’Or seems Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest, to lose.
Early reviews for May December are also excellent – looks like a very promising Cannes year.
I guess this will either win Best Film or Best Director at CANNES.
and it wouldn’t much surprise me if Jonathan Glazer shows up at the Oscars in Best Director.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3af683529d69a392e625545360beb22a98f489784d1620caccdbf886e0e74547.png
I don’t know if they are going to give Palm to an english speaking film two years in a row
Beyond The Zone of Interest being in German, it’s not like this is the same group of voters as last year. I doubt that the jury members are thinking “Well, an English language movie won last year so one shouldn’t win this year”, especially since the director of said English language movie that won the Palme last year is the head of the jury and probably doesn’t perceive their film as being the kind of thing that they should avoid awarding
The film is in German.
which actually makes me happy…
Killers of the Flower Moon premiered out of competition so it’s not going to win anything.
Oh, Zone of Interest, yeah that’s probably up there and wouldn’t be surprised if Huller wins Best Actress at Cannes for that and Anatomy of a Fall, which she is also apparently great in.
Not that De Niro needs to prove anything, but he is my favourite actor. I think he is one of the greatest. Astonishing range. I get goose bumps watching the trailer for this.
MC 91 and RT 96… BP nom and Director, locked already. Lily Gladstone probably is this year’s Ke Huy Quan. But probably too long and violent to win BP. I stick with Next Goal Wins as my suspected BP winner, once dust settles.
Palm d’Or seems Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest, to lose.
So supporting actress is locked up already. Can Leo win a second or is too soon? I am not sure if the over three hour running time will hurt it like it did The Irishman. I wonder if it would have won an award if it had been in competition.
from one of my most trusted reviewers, Leo probably won’t be even nominated – despite deserving. De Niro probably as supporting. Key is likeability of the character, and says that it’s difficult to get behind Leo’s character, because it is unatypical and certainly not a hero nor a villain, but something in between… and also Lily steals the whole film with her use of silence and her mere presence (Marty also made an Oscar worthy performance from Anna Paquin in The Irishman despite having her mostly in the background and with I think only one line of dialogue in the 4 hours film – that line came as a sledgehammer into the film and twisted the whole thing). So if KotFM is going to win an Oscar, it’s Supporting Actress. I am in doubt of anything else, unless campaigning gives the film importance as somewhat vindication of the crimes against the indigenous, but I think the smashing critical success of The Zone of Interest, is going to syphoon most steam that KotFM needs to be a BP winner… I can see TZoI sweeping critics circles for Picture and Director and become this year’s Tár, with the difference that there’s risk of a smear campaign by some groups that you can’t make a film about the holocaust without the victims front and centre (I totally disagree)
Do you think that Martin Scorcese could have won BD at the Cannes Film Festival? Also TZol is said to be a good companion piece to The White Ribbon a brilliant movie I thought.
if Glazer wins Palm, yes. However, I doubt they would give Palm and Director to two anglosaxon films, look for Director go to someone who directed a film not in english.
Killers Of The Flower Moon is not in competition at Cannes. Apple apparently decided to not to go down that route. Maybe due to pressure it would have put on the film early? Also TZol is not in Ehglish from what I have read.
did Marty ever won that award? It would have been possible
I don’t think we have a potential TAR situation here merely because the subject will demand attention. TAR was entirely cerebral. Sounds like this film might be a gut punch.
I agree I think we need a holocaust film with the killings being at the center. There’s plenty of room for a “personal” story in the genre. There’s a reason Sophie’s Choice’s rep has grown over the years.
I will always maintain that Schindler’s List would have been better had we only seen what Schindler saw (and the last 20 or so minutes chopped entirely). But I don’t think Spielberg is that good of a filmmaker to realize that. (Here is where I say he is technically brilliant, but bad at story construction)
totally agreed on Spielberg’s actual talent. I consider him an artisan, not a true author
Based on the reviews, I wouldn’t be surprised if Gladstone campaigned for Best Actress.
I guess the MC Score will drop below 90 – based on what I saw at RT.
for what it is about, some bad reviews from extreme right media will hit hard… as it happened with Jo Jo Rabbit, for example, with people not understanding what a satire is and angry for taking some things too literally
Killers of the Flower Moon will also get some pretty harsh “white wing” reactions given the subject and that it’s already going out of its way to platform Osage voices in the press and the ultimate villain is white supremacy.
I obviously haven’t seen it, but I have heard mentions that it ties in the Tulsa massacres, which happened around the same time less than an hour away from where this film is set, which is also going to set off a lot of bigots.
May December seems to be getting really solid reviews. Around 82 now on Metacritic.
Source: Clayton Davis, Variety, May 21, 2023
I’m not a fan of The Irishman was a bit hesitant towards this 4 hour epic but after reading this beautiful review, I’m more than ready for Mr Scorsese (Who still should go and wack AMPAS for snubbing his magnificent Raging Bull).
Pingback: Oscars 2024: Killers of the Flower Moon Wins Praise from Critics at Cannes – Awardsdaily
I had to laugh at people almost 10 mths off the ceremony declaring certain races over and certain people ruled out sight unseen with a long way to go.
I wouldn’t say this is a lock for any victory yet, but given the response at Cannes, this certainly sounds like a pretty good lock for major nominations. It’s telling an important and horrific story that far too few people know anything about, it’s based on a fascinating book, it has Leo and DeNiro getting some of their best reviews in a long time, it has a breakout role for Lily Gladstone, and it genuinely worked with the Osage Nation to make sure they were part of the process (and more importantly, Osage Nation members are being prominently included and platformed in the press and have nothing but good things to say about their experience working with Scorsese and how they are portrayed in the movie). Not only that, but despite its length and subject matter, people found it to be quite entertaining and well paced.
If Netflix could get all the nominations it got for The Irishman without a theatrical release, and Killers of the Flower Moon is already getting better reviews and has a guaranteed exclusive theatrical release window before it goes on Apple streaming, I simply find it hard to see how it doesn’t seem like a lock for major nominations. I could easily see it being another The Irishman come Oscar night, and there’s a lot of time between now and then, but nominations wise, I think it’s going to do well. I mean on paper, this was already as close to a lock for nominations as any other movie we know of coming down the pike. The only question was whether it would actually be good (and not just good like Silence, which I loved, but was not an Oscar movie) and now we know that it is with it’s near unanimous praise so far.
De Niro is best in villainy roles. Can’t wait.